I hate to say it, but Australia is at it again. After hunting down a tagged shark for simply being too close to shore, they now have declared their intention to "opt out of protections for 5 shark species".
The guardian writes that The government is submitting a “reservation” against three species of
thresher shark and two species of hammerhead shark listed as protected
migratory species under the UN-administered convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals.
The five types of shark were among 31 species granted new protection
status at a convention summit in November. A record 21 species of shark
and ray, including sawfish, were put on the list along with polar bears,
whales and gazelles.
Although Australia did not object to the listings in November, it is
now seeking to opt out of the commitment to cooperate with other
countries to ensure the five migratory shark species do not become
extinct. The expanded list is due to come into effect on 8 February.
Since sharks are a vital part of a healthy ocean environment it seems that the government is not too concerned about losing all the tourists who visit Australia to dive and enjoy the incredible reefs they have. The only ones they care about is the fishermen. The article quotes Alexia Wellbelove, senior program manager at Humane Society International "the opt-out was to appease commercial and recreational fishers, some of
whom catch threshers and hammerhead sharks as primary catch or as
bycatch for other species. “This is a political decision, it has nothing to do with conservation,
which is pretty pathetic really,” she said. “Australia has always spoken
out against other countries making reservations under these kinds of
treaties, so this move is really concerning.
The article states "A spokesman for the federal environment minister, Greg Hunt,
said the government’s move was to avoid “unintended consequences” for
fishers in Australia, who would risk being fined up to $170,000 and face
two years in jail even if they obeyed their permits.
So they say that their laws are too harsh for the fishermen who kill these sharks and instead of changing the punishment for the killing, they just kill the protection for these sharks. Sound reasoning indeed. (sharkasm intended)
Read the entire article here
Dashark's reaction here
I recommend that you send your opinion to the Australian tourism website here and click on the feedback link. You can also visit their Facebook page and leave a comment there.
If the politicians won't listen to us, maybe their tourist board is more receptive.
Cheers,
Martin Graf
CEO Shark Diver
About Shark Diver.
As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at staff@sharkdiver.com.
Showing posts with label stupid shark policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stupid shark policy. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Saturday, July 5, 2014
Shark Cull, last chance to submit your comments!
The submission period for public comments on the Western Australian shark cull is ending soon!
Here is the link to the official submission form!shark diving, swimming with sharks, shark week
Before submitting your comments, I recommend you listen to "DaShark" and read here. Also remember what we discussed here
I hope we can make a difference this time and avoid having to see pictures like these in the future.
| source |
Let's get this done!shark diving, swimming with sharks, shark week
Cheers,
Martin Graf
CEO
Shark Diver
About Shark Diver. As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at staff@sharkdiver.com.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Australia to kill Great White Sharks?
A article in the "Australian" reports that: "WEST Australian Fisheries officers are determined to catch and
kill a great white shark suspected of having established itself at
unpatrolled swimming beaches along the southwest coast since Christmas."
Wow, I guess the shark should know that it is not supposed to swim in an unpatrolled swimming area. They want to hunt and kill the shark simply because it's a shark, not because it has attacked anyone. The article further states:
Tony Cappelluti, from the Fisheries Department's shark response unit, said his team was almost certain they were seeing the same shark. "Our assessment is there's a shark of 3-4m, and it's a white shark, which is high risk, in the area," Mr Cappelluti said.
Almost certain? Well, I'm almost certain that a 3-4 m white shark is a juvenile that's still eating fish. Mr. Capelluti concludes by saying:
"(So) we've deemed it to be an imminent threat under the guidelines because there's possibly going to be people in areas we can't get to or can't guarantee we can mitigate the risk by getting them out of the water and keeping them out of the water."
Wouldn't it be easier to advise people not to go swimming in unpatrolled waters?
I wonder if this has to do with how we portray sharks in the media. "Shark Week" type shows and news outlets seem to cater either to those who find the most creative ways to get a shark to bite a gopro or anything else in sight, or those fools who go and ride the sharks to show how "docile" they are. Reporting how sharks really are seems to be almost non existent.
As I'm writing this I'm watching the local CBS news in San Diego, reporting that a 16 white shark that was tagged on the east coast has been spotted 17 miles off the coast of Florida. Their "expert" says that people have been advised to stay out of the water. ..... they spot a shark 17 miles away and advise people to get out of the water? .... really?!
Maybe, if we want to protect the sharks, we need to focus on educating the media, as well as government and beach safety officials, to give them an accurate description of the sharks. We should respect them for the wild predators they are, but there's no need to fear them!
Cheers,
Martin Graf
Managing Director
Shark Diver
About Shark Diver. As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at sharkcrew@gmail.com.
Wow, I guess the shark should know that it is not supposed to swim in an unpatrolled swimming area. They want to hunt and kill the shark simply because it's a shark, not because it has attacked anyone. The article further states:Tony Cappelluti, from the Fisheries Department's shark response unit, said his team was almost certain they were seeing the same shark. "Our assessment is there's a shark of 3-4m, and it's a white shark, which is high risk, in the area," Mr Cappelluti said.
Almost certain? Well, I'm almost certain that a 3-4 m white shark is a juvenile that's still eating fish. Mr. Capelluti concludes by saying:
"(So) we've deemed it to be an imminent threat under the guidelines because there's possibly going to be people in areas we can't get to or can't guarantee we can mitigate the risk by getting them out of the water and keeping them out of the water."
Wouldn't it be easier to advise people not to go swimming in unpatrolled waters?
I wonder if this has to do with how we portray sharks in the media. "Shark Week" type shows and news outlets seem to cater either to those who find the most creative ways to get a shark to bite a gopro or anything else in sight, or those fools who go and ride the sharks to show how "docile" they are. Reporting how sharks really are seems to be almost non existent.
As I'm writing this I'm watching the local CBS news in San Diego, reporting that a 16 white shark that was tagged on the east coast has been spotted 17 miles off the coast of Florida. Their "expert" says that people have been advised to stay out of the water. ..... they spot a shark 17 miles away and advise people to get out of the water? .... really?!
Maybe, if we want to protect the sharks, we need to focus on educating the media, as well as government and beach safety officials, to give them an accurate description of the sharks. We should respect them for the wild predators they are, but there's no need to fear them!
Cheers,
Martin Graf
Managing Director
Shark Diver
About Shark Diver. As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at sharkcrew@gmail.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

