We are going to Fiji in May, to dive with the bull sharks in the Shark Reef Marine Reserve. DaShark has posted this video by Howard Hall, who has just been diving there last week.
The Bulls of BAD from Howard Hall on Vimeo.
Come join us and experience these sharks up close and personal. Call us at 855.987.4275 or 619.887.4275 email staff@sharkdiver.com
Let's go shark diving.
Martin Graf
CEO Shark Diver
About Shark Diver.
As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at staff@sharkdiver.com.
Showing posts with label fiji shark dive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiji shark dive. Show all posts
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Do Shark Diving Operators need to be regulated?
![]() |
| source |
It's a great read and addresses the issues facing the shark diving industry brilliantly. DaShark is of course the very guy who was instrumental in establishing the Shark Reef National Park in Fiji! So he knows a thing or two about operating a shark dive. Check out his operation "The best shark dive in the world!"
Thorny thorny!
If you're a Shark diving operator, you need to read this!
And I cite.
5. Conclusions
In recent years there has been increasing global interest in shark-encounter tourism and the potential economic incentive and awareness raising benefits this industry may bring to shark conservation. However, recent research has indicated negative behavioural impacts arising from shark diving or snorkelling and inadequacies in management have been highlighted.
In this global study of shark tourism practices we found that in the majority of cases surveyed, shark operators apply codes of conduct (either mandatory or voluntary) to ensure the safety of both people and sharks even when no formal national guidelines exist. However, the practices and approaches taken varied widely, and we believe there is a good case for greater regulation to raise standards and minimise any adverse effects on both sharks and people. Such an approach would involve greater scrutiny of the industry and formalisation of legally enforced national guidelines.
Links are frequently made between shark baiting/provisioning and attacks, and while these remain speculative, a precautionary approach is warranted that would be best delivered through regulation. Without this, shark tourism has the potential to cause accidents which could decrease the growing popularity of sharks and thereby have negative knock on effects for their conservation, particularly when culls follow attacks such as those recently witnessed in Western Australia.
While our questionnaire indicates that the majority of shark encounters and shark tourism currently pose very little risk to people, more field research is required on shark behavioural responses to tourism practices to help assess best practices for sharks, people and environment. Shark diving management therefore needs to be dynamic and must evolve with continuing developments in the industry and understanding of shark behaviour.
First things first.
When it comes to collecting the evidence and painting a picture of
global Shark diving tourism, this paper is really quite good. Also, I
really don't want to further elaborate on what I've already said about
those problematic non-provisioned encounters with Elasmobranchs, be it
Whale Sharks, Mantas and the like, i.e. that if the industry is not able to self regulate, then the regulator has to step in - see e.g. here.
And what about those provisioned dives?
I've blogged ad nauseam about what the evidence teaches us about their effect on the animals, the public and the environment, e.g. here.
Yes there are of course people that postulate otherwise - but at this
stage in the debate, it is for them to stop speculating but instead, to
finally come up with evidence to the contrary. And no, invoking the
precautionary principle in view of those totally unsubstantiated
allegations aint good enough anymore, either!
And if they cannot come up with the evidence, they finally need to shut the fuck up - especially the researchers!
Yes Shark feeding is dangerous - dooh.
Yes often the Sharks get excited - dooh.
Yes often the Sharks get excited - dooh.
And yes there are dodgy Shark diving operators, and those unsupervised
multi-user sites like TB are a cause for concern. And we also all know
that there have been quite a number of Shark bites - very few on the
clients but plenty on the feeders, the latter ranging from harmless
because there was protective gear to serious when there was none.
But here comes the big BUT!
In tens, if not hundreds of thousands of baited Shark dives, there has
been a grand total of ONE documented fatality - and I betcha that if one
were to make the comparison to "normal" diving, you would likely find
more fatalities per hours spent in the water than during baited Shark
dives!
The reason?
Believe it or not - but none of us has a death wish, and we also want to bring back our clients unharmed!
We know that what we do is dangerous, and we are the first ones striving to minimize and manage the risks we admittedly create! This is why the overwhelming majority, if not all of Shark feeding operators have devised voluntary codes of conduct - and those protocols obviously work!
We know that what we do is dangerous, and we are the first ones striving to minimize and manage the risks we admittedly create! This is why the overwhelming majority, if not all of Shark feeding operators have devised voluntary codes of conduct - and those protocols obviously work!
Does anybody really believe that some government bureaucrats could come
up with, implement and then supervise better protocols - but more
importantly, is there really a need for them? There are already more
than sufficient laws on the books to deal with criminal negligence
vis-à-vis the customers, and accidents to the staff are covered by
occupational health-and-safety regulations - so instead of wasting
additional government resources on what is essentially a non-issue, why
don't we rely on the authorities to simply apply the Law. An guess what
- provided that the incidents are serious, they incidentally do it already!
And the suggestions by the authors?
... legally binding national guidelines for shark tourism which all shark operators need to be made aware of. Education could include mandatory classes for shark operators about species which are likely within their area, the threats facing them, current management practices, potential human impacts from tourism activities and best practice for mitigating them. Attendance at such sessions could be a formalised requirement of any permitting scheme and could be funded through charges to operators. Based on our findings and review of literature, we propose that national regulations or codes of conduct for shark-related tourism should include limits on: group sizes, time spent in the water with sharks and provisioning (both in terms of quantity and quality of food items). There needs to be compulsory education about such regulations and legal consequence should they not be followed.
Seriously - what a load of crap!
Surely, this stupidity has not been coordinated with the concerned operators - or has it?
None of the accidents I know of (and I know of many!) had anything to do
with group size, time spent in the water and amount of food, let alone
with not knowing the animals! Once again,
it really appears that some researchers are bloviating about our
industry without the slightest clue about sustainable Shark provisioning
let alone tourism - and it is really starting to piss me off!
Guys, we appreciate the interest.
But for fuck's sake, as a minimum, you need to talk to us before
accusing us of not knowing what we do! In fact, the contrary is true -
most of anything that is known about Shark behavior and sustainable
tourism practices has been garnered on dives that have been established
by our industry, and smart researchers have long learned to talk to us
and to listen to what we got to say!
Anyway, it matters not.
Governments got no time for these minutiae - that is, unless there are
real issues where self regulation has obviously failed. Then they
should, and will regulate - and when they do, I'm equally confident that
they will seek the dialogue with us, the pros!
And in the meantime, we will continue to do what is right.
We will continue to provide extremely safe, enjoyable encounters that
harm nobody - not the public, not the Sharks and not the environment.
And we will of course evolve and progress, like we always have, and like
we are presently doing by having voluntarily established GSD
and quite possibly, by collaborating with respectful people and
organizations in formulating a global code of conduct like briefly
mentioned here!
That's how you do it - by dialogue, not by proclamations ex cathedra!
To be continued no doubt!
~DaShark
Thank you DaShark! Excellent insight! ~DaShark
Cheers,
Martin Graf
CEO Shark Diver
About Shark Diver. As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at staff@sharkdiver.com.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Monster Shark in China?
The article states: "Fishermen in Rizhao, Shandong Province, hauled in an utterly massive 10-meter-long (32 foot) whale shark on Sunday, and took plenty of photos as a friendly reminder that oceans are terrifying places full of monsters. The giant fish weighed some 10,000 kilograms and was dead on arrival, but the fishermen brought it back to land where, with the use of a crane, dropped it into a truck."
The ocean is a terrifying place, full of monsters? Now just in case someone is not clear on this, whale sharks, while indeed massive animals, are feeding on plankton and are NOT a predatory shark! What is terrifying, is the fact that there are still "journalists" out there that write this utter rubbish, without having any understanding of what they are talking about and a newspaper publishing it, without checking any facts about these gentle giants.
The article concludes with: "This shark, along with that terrifyingly massive beast a few years back, serve as steady reminders to never go into the ocean ever."
The "terrifyingly massive beast a few years back" was also a harmless whale shark, a fact the author actually alluded to a few times in that blog post. Is that journalist, Eric Crouch, actually as stupid as his article suggests or is he just looking to create controversy?
Idiots like these try to scare people, instead of informing them. They never let a good fact get into the way of a headline!
We at Shark Diver are trying to educate people and give them a first hand look at how sharks really are, by taking them to Guadalupe Island, Bahamas or Bequa lagoon in Fij to dive with and experience sharks first hand. We also started shark free marinas to raise awareness of the declining shark populations. It is frustrating to see, that there are individual "journalists" out there who either don't take the time to research the subject of their article, or worse, purposely spread misinformation, simply to be able to create a sensational headline.
Cheers,
Martin Graf
CEO
About Shark Diver. As a global leader in commercial shark diving and conservation initiatives Shark Diver has spent the past decade engaged for sharks around the world. Our blog highlights all aspects of both of these dynamic and shifting worlds. You can reach us directly at sharkoperations@gmail.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

